- Aug 04, 2014
-
-
Radosław Warzocha authored
-
- Feb 14, 2013
-
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
- Oct 01, 2012
-
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
- Jul 24, 2012
-
-
Pawel Orlowicz authored
-
- Jun 05, 2012
-
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
- Apr 30, 2012
-
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
- Sep 16, 2011
-
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
- Sep 15, 2011
-
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
- Sep 08, 2011
-
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
- Sep 07, 2011
-
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
- Jun 28, 2011
-
-
ilor authored
-
- Jun 09, 2011
- May 09, 2011
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
It would create one only if top-level parse_match_operator parser rule had been used. Now it creates it within match_rule_operator parser rule, so it works for parse_wccl_file as well.
-
Adam Wardynski authored
Allows for application of all rules on an annotated sequence via apply_all method.
-
- May 06, 2011
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
This reflects the fact that positions stored in matches are absolute positions, while Position type is used in the language as position relative to current position in the sentence context. So mixing the two was confusing at the very least. This also actually fits the most recent version of spec, which no longer mentions Position, either.
-
- May 05, 2011
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
ilor authored
-
- May 04, 2011
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
It didn't like passing reference to something that could be treated as a value.
-
Adam Wardynski authored
Each subsequent rule was reusing variables object, which wasn't good. Parsing of sequences had to be changed not to end with semi, and it wasn't actually passing on lexicons in the first place.
-
- Apr 29, 2011
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
- Apr 27, 2011
-
-
ilor authored
-
- Apr 26, 2011
-
-
Paweł Kędzia authored
longest() and oneof() operator takes boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<boost::shared_ptr<ConjConditions> > >
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
So it's clear it's not about MatchRule at all.
-
ilor authored
-
- Apr 25, 2011
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
Sort of a comeback of an old idea. It's either this, or adding a third parameter soon for lexicons. I went with this as this makes it easier to add yet another thing to toss around, if such need ever arises.
-
- Apr 22, 2011
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
1) MatchOperator was essentially a wrapper for "match" section of "apply" operator 2) Other operators like Repeat actually used ConjConditions directly, without using MatchOperator - so ApplyOperator could too! 3) The confusion was about "match" referring both to part that is matching sentence against match conditions, and the results of this matching process. That led e.g. to "match_operator" rule in grammar, which was unlike "strset_operator" rule and the like. "match_operator" was about the "match" section in "apply" and now it is more straightforward. Next step should rename "match_fit" to be actual "match_operator", consistent with "XXX_operator" for other XXX types.
-
Adam Wardynski authored
Changing submatching syntax from "->" to ":" and M, MA to be shorthand for ($m:_M):1 and ($m:_M):2, respectively. Also, "M" is optional if followed by ":", "M:1" is same as ":1"
-
- Apr 21, 2011
-
-
Paweł Kędzia authored
-
Paweł Kędzia authored
-
Paweł Kędzia authored
-
Paweł Kędzia authored
-
Paweł Kędzia authored
-