- Sep 16, 2011
-
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
- Sep 08, 2011
-
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
- Sep 07, 2011
-
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
- Aug 04, 2011
-
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
Adam Radziszewski authored
-
- Jun 10, 2011
-
-
Bartosz Broda authored
-
- Jun 09, 2011
- May 06, 2011
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
It was returning Position based off absolute position, which was no good for operators like orth[first(M)] working in changing sentence contexts.
-
Adam Wardynski authored
This reflects the fact that positions stored in matches are absolute positions, while Position type is used in the language as position relative to current position in the sentence context. So mixing the two was confusing at the very least. This also actually fits the most recent version of spec, which no longer mentions Position, either.
-
- Apr 29, 2011
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
- Apr 27, 2011
-
-
ilor authored
-
- Apr 26, 2011
-
-
ilor authored
-
- Apr 21, 2011
-
-
ilor authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
Also, adding M in grammar to be shorthand for $m:_M (vargetter) op in match context.
-
- Apr 19, 2011
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
- Apr 18, 2011
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
- Apr 14, 2011
-
-
ilor authored
-
- Apr 05, 2011
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
- Dec 10, 2010
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
It is coherent now with the SentenceContext::is_inside(int abs_pos) - SentenceContext::is_inside(Position pos) is added, while Position::is_inside(SentenceContext) is removed
-
Adam Wardynski authored
I.E. empty sentence shouldn't be passed anyway and that is what Operator class is checking for. But otherwise, at the level of operator, it can deal with a sentence that has current pos outside of boundaries.
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
Previously it would mandate agreement was met on all categories in a tag with enough categories, if such tag was found. Now it checks for agreement only on the number of categories that actually match, including the case of zero categories matching (the latter does meet the weak agreement).
-
- Dec 09, 2010
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
Clearer and better performing version, also more likely to actually work as expected :)
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
- Dec 08, 2010
-
-
ilor authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
Note: still not implemented internals of agreement
-
ilor authored
The design doc for llook/rlook was incorrect, swapping the semantics per the updated docs and swapping argument order for llook.
-
ilor authored
-
ilor authored
Values cleanup and doxy: remove some redundancies, make the Begin/End constants in Position an enum, change tag_ref to contents
-
- Dec 07, 2010
-
-
Adam Wardynski authored
-
Adam Wardynski authored
The agreement stuff isn't implemented yet.
-