grammar.g

LCURLY 
options {
	paraphrase = "'{'";
} 
	: '{' 
;

RCURLY 
options {
	paraphrase = "'}'";
} 
	: '}' 
;

AT_MARK 
options {
	paraphrase = "'@'";
} 
	: '@' 
;

COMMA
options { 
	paraphrase = "','";
}
	: ','
;

SYMBOL
options { 
	paraphrase = "Symbol"; 
	testLiterals = true; 
}
	: ('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z' | '_') ('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z' | '_' | '0'..'9')*
	| '`' ('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z' | '_') ('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z' | '_' | '0'..'9')* '`'
;

WS
	: ( ' '
	  	| '\t'
	  	| '\f'
	  	| 
			( "\r\n"
				| '\r'
				| '\n'
			) { newline(); } 
		) { $setType(antlr::Token::SKIP); } 
;

COMMENT
options {
	paraphrase = "Single line comment";
}
	: "//" (~('\n'|'\r'))* { $setType(antlr::Token::SKIP);  }
;

ML_COMMENT
options {
	paraphrase = "Multi line comment";
}
  : "/*"
	(			// TODO: test it and add reference to the site it's taken from!
				/* This actually works OK despite the ambiguity that
				'\r' '\n' can be matched in one alternative or by matching
				'\r' in one iteration and '\n' in another.. But 
				this is really matched just by one rule per (...)* 
				loop iteration, so it's OK.
				This is exactly how they do it all over the web - just
				turn off the warning for this particular token.*/
		options { 
			generateAmbigWarnings = false; 
		}
      : { LA(2)!='/' }? '*'
      | '\r' '\n' { newline(); }
      | '\r' { newline(); }
      | '\n' { newline(); }
      | ~('*'|'\n'|'\r')
  	)*
    "*/"
    { $setType(antlr::Token::SKIP); }
;

HASH
options { 
	paraphrase = "'#'"; 
}
	: '#' 
;

//DSEPARATOR
//options { 
//	paraphrase = "':-'"; 
//}
//	: ":-" 
//;